Action against Respondents, a web hosting and online and email marketing company and its subsidiary, for allegedly making material misrepresentations regarding their subscriber or customer metrics and the growth of those metrics. Respondents have agreed to pay a civil penalty of $8,000,000.
Blog Posts Tagged With Corporate and Other Issues
Subscribe to Corporate and Other Issues RSS FeedIn re Panasonic Corporation (A.P. Apr. 30, 2018, Settled)
Action against Respondent, a global electronics company, for alleged anti-bribery, anti-fraud, books and records, and internal accounting controls violations. According to the SEC, Respondent was involved in a bribery scheme whereby it provided a consulting position to a government official to induce him to assist Respondent in obtaining and retaining business from a state-owned airline. The SEC further alleges that Respondent materially overstated its pre-tax income and net income by backdating an agreement with the ... Continue Reading
SEC v. PixarBio Corp. et al. (D. Mass. Apr. 24, 2018, Contested)
Action against Defendants, a biotech startup, its founder and CEO, its employee, and Defendant founder’s friend. According to the SEC, Defendants company, founder, and employee made false statements to investors about their progress in seeking FDA approval for a treatment, the amount of money Defendant company had raised, and a takeover bid of a company that Defendant founder had previously led. In addition, the SEC alleges that Defendants founder, friend, and employee engaged in a ... Continue Reading
In re Altaba Inc., f/d/b/a Yahoo! Inc. (A.P. Apr. 24, 2018, Settled)
Action against Respondent technology company in connection with material misstatements and omissions related to a cyber-breach affecting numerous user accounts. According to the SEC, Defendant learned of the breach, which resulted in unauthorized access to users’ personal information, but failed to disclose it in its public filing for approximately two years and failed to disclose business risks related to the breach, such as potential future litigation. In addition, the SEC alleges that Defendant affirmatively denied ... Continue Reading
In re The Dun & Bradstreet Corporation (A.P. Apr. 23, 2018, Settled)
Action against Respondent business information company in connection with alleged FCPA violations arising out of conduct of Respondents foreign subsidiaries. According to the SEC, Respondent’s subsidiaries made unlawful payments to obtain or retain business, and these payments were not accurately reflected in the subsidiaries’ books and records. The SEC further alleges that Respondent failed to devise and maintain sufficient internal accounting controls to detect or prevent the improper payments. Respondent has agreed to pay disgorgement ... Continue Reading
In re Medifirst Solutions, Inc. & Bruce J. Schoengood (A.P. Apr. 19, 2018, Settled)
Action against Respondents, a medical device company specializing in mobile handheld green and infrared laser devices used for anti-aging and skin care and its principal, for allegedly retaining a sanctioned accountant with knowledge that he was prohibited from acting in a financial management capacity. Respondent has agreed to pay a civil penalty of $22,500.
In re Philip John James & Kevin Silverwood (A.P. Apr. 9, 2018, Settled)
Action against Respondents, two former employees of the U.K. subsidiary of a Florida-based wholesaler of technology products, for allegedly overstating their employer’s income by concealing uncollectible receivables that should have been written off, reversing previously recorded expenses and foreign exchange losses, and prematurely recognizing a vendor rebate. Respondents previously entered into a settlement with U.K. regulatory authorities, paying fines of £35,625 (approximately $46,300).and £11,250 (approximately $14,850), respectively. In light of these payments, the SEC deemed ... Continue Reading
In re Maxwell Technologies, Inc., et al. (A.P. Mar. 27, 2018, Settled)
Action against Respondents, an energy storage and power delivery products company, its former Senior Vice President of Sales & Marketing, its former CEO, and its former Corporate Controller, in connection with an alleged accounting fraud scheme that improperly recognized revenue from future quarters in violation of GAAP. According to the SEC, Respondent company issued false and misleading statements regarding its revenue, growth, and gross margins, and inflated its reported financial results. The SEC further alleges ... Continue Reading
In re Kinross Gold Corporation (A.P. Mar. 26, 2018, Settled)
Action against Respondent, a gold mining company, for alleged violations of the books and records and internal controls provisions of the FCPA. According to the SEC, Respondent paid vendors and consultants without reasonable assurance that the transactions were consistent with their stated purpose and were not improper payments to government officials. In addition, Respondent allegedly used petty cash to make certain of these payments, which it failed to accurately describe in its books and records. ... Continue Reading
SEC v. Akorn, Inc., et al. (N.D. Ill. Mar. 26, 2018, Settled)
Action against Defendants, a pharmaceutical company, its former CEO, and its former Controller, in connection with alleged financial reporting, books and records, and internal accounting controls violations by Defendant company. According to the SEC, Defendant company failed to maintain internal controls over financial reporting related to controls on the company’s gross-to-net reserve accounts and estimates and overstated net revenue and income from continuing operations before income taxes, both issues disclosed in Defendant company’s restatement of ... Continue Reading
SEC v. Elizabeth Holmes and Theranos, Inc. (N.D. Cal. Mar. 14, 2018, Settled); SEC v. Ramesh “Sunny” Balwani (N.D. Cal. Mar. 14, 2018, Contested)
Action against Defendants, a medical device manufacturer, its founder and CEO, and its former President, for allegedly raising more than $700 million from investors on the basis of false or misleading claims. The SEC alleges that Defendants misrepresented the effectiveness of their key product, a portable blood analyzer, and made misrepresentations to potential investors regarding a contract with the Department of Defense. Defendant Holmes has agreed to pay a $500,000 penalty, to be barred from ... Continue Reading
In re Elbit Imaging, Ltd. (A.P. Mar. 9, 2018, Settled)
Action against Respondent, an Israeli holding company, for allegedly tolerating violations of the books and records and internal accounting controls provisions of the FCPA. The SEC alleges that Respondent made payments to third-party consultants and sales agents for purported services related to a Romanian real estate development project and the sale of U.S. real estate assets without evidence that the consultants and sales agents provided the contracted-for services. The SEC further alleges that Respondent failed ... Continue Reading
In re Alan Shortall (A.P. Dec. 22, 2017, Settled)
Action against the former CEO of a medical device company for allegedly misrepresenting the degree of independence of the corporation’s Board of Directors in public filings. Respondent allegedly arranged for the company to transfer funds to a director to pay for personal expenses without the knowledge of its Board of Directors, creating a conflict of interest that was not disclosed in the company’s public filings. Respondent has agreed to pay a penalty of $15,000.
In re Provectus Biopharmaceuticals (A.P. Dec. 12, 2017, Settled); In re Peter R. Culpepper, CPA (A.P. Dec. 12, 2017, Settled)
Actions against Respondents, a pharmaceutical company and its former CFO, in connection with alleged payment of millions of dollars of unearned perquisites and reimbursements. Respondent CFO also allegedly received reimbursements for non-existent travel and entertainment expenses and failed to implement sufficient internal accounting controls for such expenses. Respondent Provectus allegedly failed to implement sufficient internal accounting control and materially misstated the compensation of Respondent CEO and former CFO. Respondents CFO and Provectus have each agreed ... Continue Reading
SEC v. H. Craig Dees (E.D. Tenn. Dec. 11, 2017, Contested)
Action against Defendant, a former CEO, in connection with alleged payment of millions of dollars in unearned perquisites and reimbursements. Defendant allegedly obtained approximately $3.2 million in cash advances and reimbursements in connection with business travel expenses that were never taken and used the money to pay for personal expenses instead. The CEO is contesting the allegations.
Related Cases, In re Provectus Biopharmaceuticals (A.P. Dec. 12, 2017, Settled); In re Peter R. ... Continue Reading
In re Munchee Inc. (Dec. 11, 2017, Settled)
Action against Respondent, an app developer, in connection with an alleged unregistered offering. The SEC alleges that Respondent sought to raise capital to improve its restaurant review app, and relatedly offered and sold digital tokens to be issued on a distributed ledger, also known as an initial coin offering (“ICO”). Respondent allegedly described to investors how its tokens would increase in value and stated that they would take steps to create a secondary market, but ... Continue Reading
In re William J. Pulte (A.P. Dec. 7, 2017, Settled)
Action against former CEO and Chairman of a home construction company for alleged failure to timely disclose planned changes to the company’s management and Board of Directors, as well as the nature of Respondent’s involvement in these changes. Respondent allegedly failed to disclose actions taken to remove the then-CEO of the company, instead characterizing his removal as voluntary in public filings. Respondent has agreed to pay a civil penalty of $33,000.
In re Michael C. Sabatino, CPA (A.P. Nov. 17, 2017, Settled)
Action against former Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer of a publicly traded marketing company for allegedly contributing to the improper receipt of undisclosed compensation by the company’s Chairman and CEO. According to the SEC, Respondent approved reimbursement for various personal expenses of the CEO, not all of which were disclosed in the issuer’s proxy statements. Respondent has agreed to pay a civil penalty of $70,000.
SEC v. Osiris Therapeutics Inc., et al. (D. Mary. Nov. 2, 2017, Settled and Contested)
Action against a biotech company and four former executives for allegedly falsifying accounting data and issuing fraudulent financial statements. According to the SEC, Defendants overstated the issuer’s financial performance, including through improper revenue recognition and backdating. Defendant has agreed to pay a $1.5 million penalty, and the SEC’s action against the four Defendant executives continues.
In re Artemus Mayor (A.P. Oct. 26, 2017, Settled); In re Henry Lin-Han Jan (A.P. Oct. 26, 2017, Settled)
Related actions against president and controlling investor of SK3 Group, Inc. (“SK3”), for an alleged $2.3 million pump-and-dump scheme. According to the SEC, Respondents issued misleading press releases, periodic reports, and financial statements touting positive business developments for SK3. The SEC alleges that Respondents unlawfully caused SK3 to issue common stock to nominees, for which no exemption from registration was available. The nominees then allegedly sold the common stock into the market and transferred almost ... Continue Reading
In re YourPeople, Inc. (A.P. Oct. 26, 2017, Settled)
Action against software company and its founder and former CEO for alleged misstatements and omissions related to the company’s compliance with state insurance and licensing regulations. According to the SEC, the company raised more than $565 million from investors in connection with these misstatements and omissions in two private placements. The company has agreed to pay a civil penalty of $450,000, and the former CEO has agreed to pay $350,000 in disgorgement, $23,692.39 in prejudgment ... Continue Reading
SEC v. Rio Tinto PLC, et al. (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 17, 2017, Contested)
Action against a mining company and its former CEO and CFO for alleged fraud and reported internal control failures. Coal assets were allegedly acquired for $3.7 billion and sold a few years later for $50 million. According to the SEC, Defendants released misleading financial statements in an effort to conceal this decline in value prior to a series of U.S. debt offerings. The SEC further alleges that one Defendant then repeated and reinforced the false ... Continue Reading
In re Mergenet Medical, Inc., et al. (A.P. Oct. 16, 2017, Settled)
Action against Respondents, a developer of medical devices and several key officers and employees, for alleged material misstatements or omissions in connection with the marketing of securities. According to the SEC, these misstatements and omissions concerned the status of applications to the Food and Drug Administration for a medical device, and projected sales of the medical device and related medical supplies. Respondents Bruce Sher and Shara Hernandez each agreed to pay a civil penalty of ... Continue Reading
SEC v. Gerardo de Nicolás et al. (S.D. Cal. Oct. 11, 2017, Contested)
Action against CEO of Mexico-based homebuilding company Desarrolladora Homex S.A.B. de C.V., and other executive officers with an alleged $3.3 billion accounting fraud based on reporting revenues for homes that had not been built. The SEC used satellite imagery to help uncover the accounting scheme and illustrate its allegation that Homex had not even broken ground on many of the homes for which it reported revenues. The SEC’s complaint also alleges that Defendants caused Homex ... Continue Reading
