Blog Posts Tagged With Cases of Interest

SEC v. Oleksandr Ieremenko, et al. (D.N.J. Jan. 15, 2019, Contested)

Action against Defendants and Relief Defendants, 11 individuals and two companies, for alleged hacking and insider trading. According to the SEC, Defendants hacked a newswire service and the SEC’s EDGAR system to obtain material nonpublic information on earnings announcements of public companies.  The SEC alleges that Defendants traded while in possession of this information.  The U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of New Jersey has brought parallel criminal charges.

SEC Litigation Release

SEC Complaint

SEC
Continue Reading

In re Polycom, Inc. (A.P. Dec. 26, 2018, Settled)

Action against Respondent, a communication product company, for alleged violations of the FCPA’s books and records and internal accounting controls provisions.  According to the SEC, Respondent’s subsidiary provided discounts to distributors and resellers with the understanding that the discounts would be used to make cash payments to government officials who had influence over purchasing decisions.  The SEC further alleges that Respondent failed to maintain adequate accounting controls and lacked an effective anti-corruption compliance program with
Continue Reading

In re Centrais Elétricas Brasileiras S.A. (A.P. Dec. 26, 2018, Settled)

Action against Respondent, a partially state-owned Brazilian energy company, for alleged violations of the FCPA’s books and records and internal accounting controls provisions.  According to the SEC, officers of Respondent’s subsidiary engaged in a scheme to rig construction bids, inflate contract prices, and pay bribes to government officials.  The SEC further alleges that Respondent’s accounting controls were inadequate.  Respondent has agreed to pay a civil penalty of $2.5 million.

SEC Order

SEC Administrative Summary
Continue Reading

In re Wealthfront Advisers, LLC (f/k/a Wealthfront, Inc.) (A.P. Dec. 21, 2018, Settled)

Action against Respondent, a robo-adviser, for alleged false statements to clients.  According to the SEC, Respondent failed to monitor client accounts for transactions that would cause wash sales, despite promising to do so, improperly published client testimonials, improperly paid for client referrals, and failed to implement adequate policies, procedures, and a compliance program.  Respondent has agreed to pay a civil penalty of $250,000.

SEC Order

SEC Press Release
Continue Reading

In re Hedgeable, Inc. (A.P. Dec. 21, 2018, Settled)

Action against Respondent, a robo-adviser, for alleged misleading statements to clients regarding Respondent’s performance.  According to the SEC, Respondent’s promotional material included select data from high-performing client accounts and made false comparisons against competitors’ trading models.  The SEC also alleges that Respondent failed to maintain required records and a compliance program reasonably designed to prevent violations of the securities laws.    Respondent has agreed to pay a civil penalty of $80,000.

SEC Order

SEC Press Release
Continue Reading

SEC v. Jared Jeffrey Davis and Dale Burke Pinchot (N.D. Ohio, Dec. 10, 2018, Settled)

Action against Defendants, two business partners, for alleged operation of  an unregistered binary options trading business and fraud on investors.  According to the SEC, Defendants misrepresented to investors the probability of success and failed to disclose that one Defendant manipulated its software to the detriment of customers.  Defendants have agreed to a permanent injunction against participating in the issuance, purchase, offer, sale, or promotion of any binary option security, and disgorgement and civil penalties to
Continue Reading

SEC v. Mark Suleymanov (E.D.N.Y. Dec. 3, 2018, Settled)

Action against Defendant, an options broker, for alleged unregistered securities offering and fraud on investors.  According to the SEC, Defendant operated several websites from which he publicly offered and sold binary options but failed to register with the SEC, misrepresented the profitability of the offered securities, manipulated trading results, and prevented investors from withdrawing funds.  According to the SEC, Defendant also misused and commingled investor funds with his own.  Defendant has agreed to pay disgorgement,
Continue Reading

In re Khaled Khaled (A.P. Nov. 29, 2018, Settled)

Action against Respondent, a celebrity music producer, for alleged touting violations in connection with initial coin offerings. According to the SEC, Respondent promoted three initial coin offerings on his social media accounts without disclosing that the issuers were compensating him for the publicity.  Defendant has agreed to pay disgorgement of $50,000, prejudgment interest of $2,725.72, and a civil penalty of $100,000.

SEC Order

SEC Press Release
Continue Reading

In re Floyd Mayweather Jr. (A.P. Nov. 29, 2018, Settled)

Action against Respondent, a professional boxer, for alleged touting violations in connection with initial coin offerings.  According to the SEC, Respondent promoted three initial coin offerings on his social media accounts without disclosing that the issuers were compensating him for the publicity.  Respondent has agreed to pay disgorgement of $300,000, prejudgment interest of $14,775.67, and a civil penalty of $300,000.

SEC Order

SEC Press Release
Continue Reading

In re Paragon Coin, Inc. (A.P. Nov. 16, 2018, Settled)

Action against Respondent, a company established to implement blockchain technology in the cannabis industry, for an alleged unregistered offering. According to the SEC, Defendant publicly offered and sold digital tokens to raise capital without registering the offering or attempting to qualify for an exemption to the registration requirements.  Defendant has agreed to pay a civil penalty of $250,000.

SEC Press Release

SEC Order
Continue Reading

In re CarrierEQ, Inc., d/b/a Airfox (A.P. Nov. 16, 2018, Settled)

Action against Respondent, a mobile technology business, for an alleged unregistered offering.  According to the SEC, Defendant publicly offered and sold digital tokens to raise capital without registering the offering or attempting to qualify for an exemption to the registration requirements.  Defendant agreed to pay a civil penalty of $250,000.

SEC Press Release

SEC Order
Continue Reading

SEC v. Mark E. Fisher and Joseph F. Capuozzo (S.D. Fla. Oct. 22, 2018, Settled)

Action against Defendants, an attorney and a businessman, for their alleged participation in a “pump and dump” scheme. The SEC alleges that Defendants acquired penny stock shares, launched a marketing campaign to boost the stock’s liquidity and price, and then sold the shares.  Defendants have agreed to lifetime bars from participating in penny stock offerings and will pay disgorgement, interest, and civil penalties in amounts to be determined by the court. Parallel criminal charges have
Continue Reading

SEC v. Jean Danhong Chen, et al. (N.D. Cal. Oct. 18, 2018, Contested)

Action against Defendants, an immigration attorney, her husband, her law firm, a family friend, a family employee, and two of the couple’s owned entities, for alleged facilitation of an EB-5 visa offering fraud.  According to the SEC, Defendants received over $10 million in undisclosed commissions from sales of securities to Defendant attorney’s clients. The SEC also alleges that Defendant attorney and Defendant husband advised clients to invest in an EB-5 immigrant investor regional center that
Continue Reading

SEC v. Blockvest, LLC and Reginald Buddy Ringgold, III a/k/a Rasool Abdul Rahim El (S.D. Cal. Oct. 3, 2018, Contested)

Action against Defendants, a cryptocurrency exchange and index fund and its founder and principal, for alleged misrepresentations in connection with a cryptocurrency offering.  According to the SEC, Defendants falsely claimed that their initial coin offering was licensed and regulated by the SEC and that their business would be audited by an accounting firm.

SEC Litigation Release

SEC Press Release
Continue Reading

CFTC v. Gelfman Blueprint, Inc. and Nicholas Gelfman (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 1, 2018, Consent Order)

Action against Defendants, a Bitcoin hedge fund and its CEO, for alleged operation of a Bitcoin Ponzi scheme.  According to the CFTC, Defendants promised to use investor funds in a high-frequency algorithmic trading strategy but instead used the funds to make payouts to other investors.  The CFTC also alleges that Defendants falsified performance reports and staged a computer hack to conceal trading losses and misappropriation of investor funds.  Defendant company has agreed to pay restitution
Continue Reading

 SEC v. Elon Musk (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 27, 2018, Settled); SEC v. Tesla, Inc. (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 29, 2018, Settled)

Action against Defendants, a car company and its CEO and former Chairman, in connection with a series of allegedly false and misleading Twitter communications by Defendant CEO.  According to the SEC, Defendant CEO tweeted to followers that, subject to a shareholder vote, Defendant company had secured sufficient funding to go private at a higher price than its trading price.  The SEC alleges that Defendant CEO knew that the transaction was not definite and that he
Continue Reading

In re Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. – Petrobras (A.P. Sept. 27, 2018, Settled)

Action against Respondent, an oil and gas company, for misleading investors in connection with an alleged corruption scheme.  According to the SEC, some of Respondent’s former senior executives, in conjunction with Respondent’s contractors and suppliers, raised the cost of infrastructure projects in order to receive kickbacks which were then paid to foreign politicians and political parties who had helped the senior executives obtain their titles with Respondent.  The SEC further alleges that the former executives
Continue Reading

In re ICAP Capital Markets LLC n/k/a InterCapital Capital Markets LLC (A.P. Sept. 18, 2018, Settled)

Action against Respondent, a registered introducing broker, for allegedly aiding and abetting attempts of some of its clients to manipulate the USD ISDAFIX benchmark.  The CFTC alleges that Respondent’s swaps brokers assisted some of Respondent’s bank clients with attempted manipulation of the benchmark to benefit the client’s derivatives positions.  Respondent has agreed to pay a $50 million civil penalty and post-judgment interest.

CFTC Press Release 

CFTC Order
Continue Reading

In re Bank of America, N.A. (A.P. Sept. 18, 2018, Settled)

Action against Respondent bank, a provisionally registered swaps dealer, for allegedly attempting to manipulate the USD ISDAFIX benchmark.  The CFTC alleges that Respondent made false submissions and engaged in manipulative trading in  targeted interest rate products to benefit its derivatives positions.  Respondent has agreed to pay a $30 million civil penalty and post-judgment interest.

CFTC Press Release   

CFTC Order
Continue Reading

In re Citigroup Global Markets, Inc. and Citi Order Routing and Execution, LLC (A.P. Sept. 14, 2018, Settled)

Action against Respondent bank and its affiliate for alleged material misstatements to institutional customers related to a “dark pool” operated by Respondent affiliate.  The SEC alleges that Respondent  bank misrepresented that the “dark pool” was an exclusive trading venue that did not allow high-frequency traders.  The SEC further alleges that Respondent bank failed to disclose to customers that it routed some of their orders to external, less expensive trading venues and that Respondent affiliate improperly
Continue Reading

In re Convergex Execution Solutions, LLC, now known as Cowen Execution Services LLC (A.P. Sept. 13, 2018, Settled)

Action against Respondent, a broker-dealer, for alleged incomplete and inaccurate regulatory filings.  The SEC alleges that Respondent failed to take reasonable steps to ensure that the securities transactions reported in its electronic “blue sheets” submissions contained complete and accurate information, such as customer identifying information, order execution times, and additional trade execution information.  Respondent has agreed to pay a civil penalty of $2.75 million.

SEC Order  

SEC Press Release
Continue Reading

In re TokenLot, LLC, et al. (A.P. Sept. 11, 2018, Settled)

Action against Respondents, an unregistered broker-dealer and its two operators, for the alleged online sale and advertisement of unregistered securities in the form of digital tokens.  The SEC alleges that Respondents solicited and executed digital token orders during initial coin offerings and additionally sold digital tokens for trading on secondary markets.  According to the SEC, Respondents failed to make required registrations as a broker-dealer.  Respondents have agreed to pay, jointly and severally, disgorgement of $471,000
Continue Reading

In re United Technologies Corporation (A.P. Sept. 11, 2018, Settled)

Action against Respondent, a high-technology manufacturer, for alleged violations of the FCPA’s anti-bribery, books and records, and internal accounting controls provisions.  According to the SEC, Respondent, through its wholly owned subsidiary, made improper payments to Azerbaijani officials to influence sales of Respondent’s elevator equipment.  The SEC further alleges that one of Respondent’s joint ventures made payments to a sales agent despite knowing that the agent would likely use the funds to improperly pay a Chinese
Continue Reading

In re Crypto Asset Management, LP and Timothy Enneking (A.P. Sept. 11, 2018, Settled)

Action against Respondents, an unregistered cryptocurrency hedge fund manager and its principal, for the alleged sale of unregistered securities.  The SEC alleges that Respondents failed to make required registrations and misrepresented their filing status to potential investors while raising money for a cryptocurrency investment fund.  Respondents have agreed to pay a $200,000 civil penalty.

 SEC Order  

SEC Press Release

 
Continue Reading

LexBlog